Saturday, October 19, 2013

Issue 33 (2013-2014)

Issue 33 (October 10, 2013)

Sidebar
Can you take it with you?
 Nope. But you can see the show tonight, tomorrow or Saturday.

Speaking of which:
Last night during rehearsal, the love scene between Nicholas and Amanda got so steamy that when combined with the smoke from Greg's fireworks, the fire alarm went off.

Weapons of Sass Destruction
If the EPA really is down, it seems their young successors will have to take up their burden a few years early. Green Campus Initiative has stockpiled fifty megatons of sass to be used on anyone caught dumping hazardous wastes in the environment. Don't worry, these weapons are carbon-neutral. I'm looking at you, Ben Higgs.
The government default looms...
So feel free to give me your US Dollars in exchange for Twinkies, a much more reliable currency, rumored to be able to store value even through a nuclear apocalypse. Exchange rate is currently set at $1542 USD: 1 Twinkie

Journalism Quiz:
We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave.…
So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark—that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.

Poety Quiz:
This thou perceiv'st, which makes thy love more strong,
To love that well, which thou must leave ere long.


Writing Prompt: Write a story in ten words or fewer. Strong submissions will be featured in the sidebar.

Articles

Function Boxes
By: Matt "the one who knocks" Healey
                Yesterday, the senior class spent their enrichment/milk-break getting their uniforms checked. The dean's office told my advisory to show up at the student center at 9:45. We didn't get to actually go inside until 10:00, so we had about fifteen minutes to ponder the silliness of the situation.
                If you've ever had Mr. Kime as a teacher, you've heard of function boxes. X goes into the function box and F(x) comes out. The student center acted as a special type of function box yesterday: a uniform violator box. Girls with skorts to their knees entered, only to come out with the same skorts now rolled back up ten inches above the knee. Guys walked in with standard Lands End pants and all black shoes, but left with Volcom jeans and new logo-ridden shoes. I'm not even exaggerating. I actually saw someone borrow a pair of pants just for the check and return to their Volcolm's afterwards.
                The only people who actually received UV's were the honest ones who went inside dressed the way they dress on most days. Everyone else just fixed their uniform for the check, and messed it back up  once they were out of Mr. Beamer's sight. The process wasted student's time (I had plenty of homework I planned to finish during milk-break) and it wasted the uniform checkers' time. Even teachers laughed at it while waiting outside.
                I understand that plenty of people think it's ridiculous to get worked up about something as trivial as uniform violations. I agree that they're trivial, until you actually start getting detentions from them. It only takes two UV's - one during the end of a quarter. Maybe instead of changing the uniform (given that to people like Colin it's very comforting) like Dan Forssman suggests, the dean's office could resolve the discontent surrounding uniform violations by easing up on punishments.

The Bishop's Difference
By: Andy Secondine (DU Guest Writer)
Last month, there was an Op-Ed piece in the New York Times about how we as a society give children too many awards. The piece refers to empirical evidence which shows that too many awards cause students to underachieve.
At Bishop’s, the awards the school gives out tend to be well deserved and hard to come by. Less so are other forms of recognition. At announcements, the names of people who did well on the PSAT were proclaimed. Recognition is fine; however, in an environment as competitive as Bishop’s, it can serve not to praise those who did well but to shame those who did not.
By flaunting the accomplishments of a few distinguished students, it places ever more pressure on those of us who failed to live up to expectations. My G.P.A. is not perfect. I’m not skilled enough to win grant money for my miraculous-scientific-breakthrough-that-fundamentally-changes-our-understanding-of-life. That doesn’t mean I should feel ashamed to show my face at school. I work hard in class. I do the assignments. I juggle a crazy schedule. Why isn’t that enough? Perhaps because whenever the work of a distinguished few is trotted out in front of us, it raises expectations, and it degrades our accomplishments. Rather than feeling proud of my peers, I feel judged. We started the year with a speech about accepting our shortcomings. Less than a month later, the message is clear: imperfection is intolerable

No comments:

Post a Comment